Red Lake Net News
Michael Barrett
P. O. Box 80
Redby, MN  56670
Telephone:  218-679-5995

mbarrett@rlnn.com
News updated daily...
red lake net news
rlnn.com
Copyright © 2003-2005 Red Lake Net News
All Rights Reserved.

Home
Contact
About Us
RL News
Photographs
Feedback
Legal and Privacy Information
Red Lake Schools
click here
Home
Contact Us
About Us
Services
RL News
Native News
Advertising
Student Works
Events
Opinions
Photographs
Obituaries
Archives
Feedback
Site Map
Links
Profiles
Classified ads
Business cards
Birthday ads
Memorials
Home
Employment
About Us
Services
RL News
Native News
Student Works
Ojibwemowin
Profiles
Opinions
Photographs
Obituaries
Archives
Feedback
Advertising
Links
Contact Us
Red Lake Births
Birthday ads
Memorials
Classified ads
About Red Lake
Memorials
RL Constitution
Memorials
Humor
RL History
Contact Us
RLNewspaper

Tribes against casino bill

A House committee is looking at a plan to allow Indian gaming in urban areas

 

By Claire Vitucci

Washington Bureau


      WASHINGTON - Proposed federal legislation that would restrict Indian tribes from building urban casinos far from their ancestral lands wouldn't do enough to halt "reservation shopping," an Inland tribal chairman said Wednesday.

      Deron Marquez, chairman of the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, which operates a casino near Highland in San Bernardino County, has written a letter to House Resources Chairman Richard Pombo.

      He said the lawmaker's proposed bill could allow more reservation shopping, in which landless tribes or tribes on isolated reservations try to put casinos on prime urban real estate.

      A hearing on the proposed legislation is scheduled for today in Washington before the House Resources Committee.

      A draft bill by Pombo, R-Tracy, would allow tribes to build casinos away from their reservations as long as they were put in designated "Indian Economic Opportunity Zones."

      Two such zones would be allowed per state, one on Indian land and one off tribal land. Their location of the zones would then be determined by the federal secretary of the Interior.

      Marquez said that goes against what Indians promised California voters when they approved ballot propositions legalizing Indian gambling in 1998 and 2000.

      At the time, opponents warned that casinos could pop up in suburban and urban areas, but tribes insisted those were scare tactics.

      "We campaigned over and over again as a unified tribal group that that's not going to happen," Marquez said.

      "A few short years later, you have developers leading tribes into a dangerous area."

      The San Manuel tribe and the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians near Temecula have announced their opposition to a bid by the Northern California-based Lytton Band of Pomo Indians to place a casino in San Pablo, a suburb of San Francisco.

      The Lytton deal would allow that tribe to build a 2,500-slot machine casino on nontraditional land in a heavily populated area.

      The tribe, which purchased the urban land in San Pablo, has roots in Sonoma County.