|
| Red Lake Net News Michael Barrett P. O. Box 80 Redby, MN 56670 Telephone: 218-679-5995 |
| News updated daily... |
![]() |
| red lake net news |
![]() |
| rlnn.com |
| Copyright © 2003-2006 Red Lake Net News All Rights Reserved. |
![]() |
![]() |
| Site Map |
| Links |
| Classified ads |
| Business cards |
| Birthday ads |
| Memorials |
| Classified ads |
| Memorials |
Mad cow begets new breed of animal tracker
By Matt McKinney Ted Radintz doesn't always know where your cow came from, but someday, he
might. His new job at
the state Department of Agriculture as coordinator of the National Animal
Identification System drops him into the middle of a national effort to tag
each and every animal in the food chain with some kind of unique number. Why do
that, you ask? About 25
million cattle are slaughtered in the United States every year. The 2003
outbreak of bovine spongiform encephalopathy -- or mad cow disease --
underscored just how difficult it can be to trace the history of a sickened
animal. That experience
gave birth to the National Animal Identification System, allowing health
experts to learn the entire history of any animal within 48 hours. Launched in
2004, it's a voluntary program that so far has drawn registrations from
slightly more than one-sixth of Minnesota's farmers. The animals
covered include cattle, swine, sheep, poultry, bison, llamas, alpacas, horses,
deer, elk and goats. The methods to tag them vary from animal to animal and
include DNA, retinal scans, ear tags and even radio frequency tags the size of
a kernel of rice that could be slipped under the animal's skin. Radintz, a
cattle farmer from Maple Grove, has been given expanded responsibilities to
promote the program among Minnesota farmers. He talked to the Star Tribune on
Friday about his new job. Q How does the system
work right now? A Currently, we rely a
lot on paper records. If the farmer has good records of where all of the
animals came from, that would be one way. It's just a paper trail, and the
trail is only as good as the records that were kept. Q What would each animal
get, a tattoo or a tag? A It's going to depend on
species. Each species nationally has a working group to identify the best ways
to identify each animal. If we use ear tags, for example, in cattle, sheep and
in some cases pigs, that might work out great. But ear tags aren't going to
work so good for poultry. Q Who will pay for it? A To register your
premises, that's free. Some of the ID applications, there are going to be small
costs. More than likely those costs, like in cattle for example, if they use a
radio frequency ID tag, that costs about $2 per head, so that cost will be
borne by the producer. As time goes on, I think those ear tags will go down in
price. Q What sort of buy-in
have you had from farmers so far? A So far in Minnesota we
have over 11,000 premises identified. ... We roughly feel that there are 63,000
premises in Minnesota that we need to identify. Q Might this someday lead
to a food identification system in which consumers could pick up a steak at the
supermarket and learn from a barcode or number on it where the meat came from,
how it was raised, how old the animal was, etc? A I think that the animal
ID system might not provide the consumers that, but I think the ID system is
the building block for other marketing programs to be developed. So if there is
a food producer that wants to sell meat, or beef that has certain claims, say
natural fed, they could use the national animal ID system to track which
animals qualify for their programs and which ones don't. Q What's the timeline for
this program? A The [U.S. Department of
Agriculture] guidelines have been they would love to have 100 percent of
livestock premises identified by 2009. For more
information, see National Animal Identification System at the state Board of
Animal Health: www.bah.state.mn.us |